(no subject)

[twincityhacker]

Just argued in Intro to Ethics class that bigiots/sexists/rapists/ect. pleasure at their torments is vaild form of pleasure. Though still wrong. Bad and immoral and... yeah, WRONG.

If I didn't have Spanish in... over an hour. Hour and forty-five minutes I'd be at the dorm taking a shower.

Comments

[hideyuki-tah.livejournal.com]

>_> How can it be valid if it's bad, immoral, and wrong?

[msp-hacker.livejournal.com]

I'm saying that it's true that they recive some sick, sadistic pleasure from it when I'm saying that they recive valid pleasure.

Yeah, it makes me feel dirty just to say it.

[ship2shore.livejournal.com]

pleasure doesn't have morality. it's just a feeling, caused by many different things. the things that lead to pleasure are often questionable, but the feeling itself real.

[msp-hacker.livejournal.com]

Yeah, I was trying to argue against the statement that Unitarinism is wrong because it says that bigots recive plasure from doing acts of biotry. Thoughout the entire arguement the first line was usually "First, WTF?" - only in my notebook when I was writting down both sides of the debate.