twincityhacker: hands in an overcoat's pockets (A terrible swift sword)
twincityhacker ([personal profile] twincityhacker) wrote2006-10-09 02:55 pm

(no subject)

Just argued in Intro to Ethics class that bigiots/sexists/rapists/ect. pleasure at their torments is vaild form of pleasure. Though still wrong. Bad and immoral and... yeah, WRONG.

If I didn't have Spanish in... over an hour. Hour and forty-five minutes I'd be at the dorm taking a shower.

[identity profile] hideyuki-tah.livejournal.com 2006-10-09 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
>_> How can it be valid if it's bad, immoral, and wrong?
ext_52603: (Default)

[identity profile] msp-hacker.livejournal.com 2006-10-09 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm saying that it's true that they recive some sick, sadistic pleasure from it when I'm saying that they recive valid pleasure.

Yeah, it makes me feel dirty just to say it.

[identity profile] ship2shore.livejournal.com 2006-10-09 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
pleasure doesn't have morality. it's just a feeling, caused by many different things. the things that lead to pleasure are often questionable, but the feeling itself real.
ext_52603: (Default)

[identity profile] msp-hacker.livejournal.com 2006-10-10 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I was trying to argue against the statement that Unitarinism is wrong because it says that bigots recive plasure from doing acts of biotry. Thoughout the entire arguement the first line was usually "First, WTF?" - only in my notebook when I was writting down both sides of the debate.