Just finnished watching Hannibal, and it was... okay. The movie was formatted to network television, CBS infact, so of course it was a tad less gorey. Which was fine, because I was eatting supper at the same time. The biggest beef I had with the thing is they completly changed the ending from that of the book.
And that the 11:00/10:00 news afterwards had the leading story of how "The Hannibal of Staen Island" might be getting out on prolle soon. So thier going to try him with the murder of another of his victems, whose body they never found, 23 year old recollections of what happened, and some hearsay between convicts in the clink.
Shouldn't they have done this, oh say, TWENTY-THREE YEARS AGO? The only new evidence they have is the above metioned boasting about what he did. And the evidence they had of the first case was pretty weak as well, but at least that time, they had a body. But the only thing they could get him on was kiddnapping, because pople only saw him in the area.
I'm pulling all of this from a news blurb, so it could be far more complicated than this and with more evidence. They had to report about someone else getting killed in a hit and run acciendent, and an atm hijacking ring.
( More Spoliers! )