(no subject)

[twincityhacker]

My mind is going to some werid places on my paper. I was just thinking about the passages in the Bible that *supposedly* says that homosexuality is an ambomination.

Based on a word that St. Paul made up in Greek, which is either a euthisum for a man engaging in sexual relations with another man, or has something to do with male/male prostotution/rape.

But that's not really it. It has to do with innertcy.

When we were talking about the Consitution in goverment, there were two view points - the strict-constructialist that interpts that only laws that are absoulutely necessary to carry out the provisions in the constution, and the flexible-constuctionist view that laws that help carry out the powers in the Consituion are neccesary.

Fundementalists belive that the Bible is innerent, that what the words mean is what the words mean, and there is no metaphors or symbolic imagery. Non-fundelmentalists think otherwise.

Have you ever thought that fundementalists and strict-constutionalists have a lot in common? They aren't the same people, since I'm sure that there are some fundelmentalists who want to turn the country into an offical theocracy, and that there are pagan strict-constructionists. But that the idea that these words that are set forth shall not change, because what our forefathers belived is the best think because they thought of it? Even if they were just as immoral and crazy and power-hungry as we are?



Well, it was either this or ranting about further univese construction things. Right now I'm working on the shape of the omniverse, since the shape of the 'verses work well on a local level (I have fourth and third dimensional space visualised, but not the others), just I'm not sure if I can have true parrell dimensions in a sphere - and trying to visualise cyliders on a saddle shape omniverse is apparently insanity inducing.

Plus, my omniverse is based off of Portal, Digimon, and the Buffyverse. Mostly since they all seem to work off of the same idea, with some minor modifications.

Now to just figure out if omnidimensional space is a biverse gateway, a polyverse gateway, or laying outside a verse, or just describes the space since it's the absensces of something that defines it. The only reason why this bothers me is because of radio, or what people used to travel in (hence "on the air" or more properly "on the aether") Do the universe really need to be in anything?

You scored as Giles. Giles. Wise. Comforting. Simple. Nervous. Slow Thinker. You take comfort in the title "Old Fashioned Gentleman". Simple luxuries make you happy. You like the life of a teacher and guide and enjoy watching people take the knowedge you give them and make good with it. Although never a father yourself, you show all the qualities of a father to those you care for. And for that reason, you will never be alone. </td> Giles 78% Cordelia 70% Willow 68% Angel 65% Buffy 63% Xander 58% Spike 58% Oz 55% Wesley 55% Lorne 53% Anya 45% Doyle 43% Faith 43% Harmony 35% What Buffyverse (Angel & Buffy) Character are you most like? created with QuizFarm.com