(no subject)

I'm guessing that when you say - like I just did to Tasha - "Oh, I'm hungry! That means I can put off working on my paper more." one is seriously far down on the list of excuses for procrastinating.

But then in my grand tradition of ethics papers, I've summed up a five page paper into two paragraphs and can't really see where the hell I'm going to attempt to pad it out and still keep it on topic, as I do have longer bits written, but as one's on while humans have the inailenble right of self-determinism, it doesn't always work out well, and the varying definitions of suicide, and whether accidentally killing yourself is still suicide. I'm explaining everything that matters in the debate is the intent of the person who would die, so this might work.

But I'm still getting lunch/dinner first.

And I still have to go Christmas shopping and study. Ick.

(no subject)

I was going to rec this on indeedsir, except for a discussion of the community in the comments, I thought best not. Well, I suppose I could as it doesn't get too much worse than "too each their own," but I'm wary of provoking... unpleasantness. Though, seriously, how much unpleasantness could ensue from one of the nicest communities I've ever been in?

ANYWAY. But it does not say that the post itself is not hilarious. In response to [Bad username or site: @ livejournal.com] asking whether or not it would be terrible to cast Hugh Grant as a NPC in an RPG just to mentaly picturing him say "Excuse me, I, ah, well, well, I could be wrong, but I seem to... erm... be a brain in some sort of... jar?".

One slight error in reading the text, taimatsu posts this, a reworking of the line with Jeeves and Wooster in the comments. Because, really, Hugh Laurie would sound just as funny.