I need another word for "unknowable"

[twincityhacker]

1. Everything is connected. Why limit yourself to incomplete knowlage in one subject, when to really understand the subject, you need to know a host of other things for that one particular thing to have the subject make sense in contact. For instance, to understand the limitations of science in a particular period, or why someone didn't realize something, you need to know the current time period, how people think, how a given group of people act, the science at that particualr time and the science now, and so on. So saying that a particualr branch of study should be pressude is complete and udder crap, IMHO.

2. As much as religion is tabbo, I like thinking about it and thinking it out much more than is probably healthy. For instance, I can't quite put forth why I think studing history is relevent to how the world currently works, but I can enouciante my current opionion on religion fairly well. Probably since I've always trying to make my convictions on relgion and people make sense to other people more than trying to convince people to study history. = \

3. I don't write linear. I write an idea, then jump from diffrent points in the document. Then when I have all the important points down, I connect them. Do other people write like this?

Comments

[myrthrilmercury.livejournal.com]

What are you writing about? I've been toying with a slash piece for a little while, but it's going nowhere at the moment.

[msp-hacker.livejournal.com]

What I'm supposed to be writting is my college essay.

What I'm getting insanely fustrated with is the slash piece for grayscastle, with my story count either three or six, depending on how you're counting.

Plus I have to put the finishing touches on a story I wrote for class.