twincityhacker (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
twincityhacker) wrote2005-02-26 09:19 pm
twincityhacker) wrote2005-02-26 09:19 pm
Entry tags:
But the newer adaptions sadly have no square dancing in them
As I go though life, I turn more towards the good, and the beautiful. Or at the very least I think of Dr. Clayton Forrester, the Square-Dancing Astro/Nuclearfissist.
I'm very excited to see the remake of the War of the Worlds this summer, and keep checking the television for new trailers. But as I was checking for pictures, and checking what the main chartecter name is going to be since I'm taking the wild leap that theyr'e giong to name the main charecter in this particular verison. (His name is "Ray Ferrier" this time, dammit.)
Then I came across this beauty: War of the Worlds. What makes this special is it looks to be a lower-budget indie film and is being realesed in about 30 days. The film is also a faithful interpetation of the book, which means that: it's set at the turn of the 19th centuery, none of the charecters have names, and the martians have walkers and are going to suck human blood for nourishment! The tralier.
I'm very excited to see the remake of the War of the Worlds this summer, and keep checking the television for new trailers. But as I was checking for pictures, and checking what the main chartecter name is going to be since I'm taking the wild leap that theyr'e giong to name the main charecter in this particular verison. (His name is "Ray Ferrier" this time, dammit.)
Then I came across this beauty: War of the Worlds. What makes this special is it looks to be a lower-budget indie film and is being realesed in about 30 days. The film is also a faithful interpetation of the book, which means that: it's set at the turn of the 19th centuery, none of the charecters have names, and the martians have walkers and are going to suck human blood for nourishment! The tralier.